Once you’ve thought about it a bit, the righteous emotion some display when talking about how important it is to vote is sadly humorous.
It’s humorous because it’s such a classic display of shallow thought thundering all rough and tumble and knowing.
It’s sad, because when you do the math, you find that while voting is valuable when you don’t have the option/right to vote, it pales - might even be considered all but useless - compared to sustained interpersonal politics.
Consider an elected position with a term of 2 years.
Each person gets one vote, which they’re allowed to exercise once every 2 years. It takes about 10 minutes. So the voter exercises an entire 10 minutes of influence upon the political system every 2 years. That’s 10 minutes out of the 1,051,200 minutes there are in 2 years.
While that walloping 10 minutes out of 1,051,200 might be a lot if elected representatives were quarantined in solitary confinement, with no opportunity to interact with so-called “special interests”, then maybe that astounding 10 minutes of civic effort might be something to hoot and holler about.
But guess what? Elected representatives are not quarantined in solitary confinement. They’re accessible to others. Any and all others.
Let’s say someone wines and dines a representative. How long does that take? A couple hours? Let’s call it 120 minutes.
And that’s just once! 120 is 12 times bigger than 10. And it’s quality time to boot. It’s time where the person making the effort to get through to the representative has direct access - they can state their causes and reasoning in as much detail as they wish.
The voter? Um… well… what message did they send? Oh, right… that they generally maybe sorta kinda believe in most of what the candidate is said to believe.
At a bare minimum, the winer/diner has 12 times more influence than a voter. And since it’s direct communication, it’s really a lot more than that. Theirs is no mere vote of confidence. They have the opportunity to persuade.
And if they perform said wining/dining several times a year? Well, just keep multiplying out the effective influence.
Do we get it now, voter rights mongers? Do we see why putting a lot of effort into getting people to vote really doesn’t mean shit compared with, say, getting them to actively participate with their elected officials?
Yeah, sure… a vote means a ton if/when you don’t have a vote. But once you do, it means almost nothing compared with personally interacting with elected representatives.